Gambling & Prediction Market Data Privacy Statistics 2026
How much location and behavioral data betting and prediction-market platforms collect, and the litigation now testing whether that data is handled lawfully — sourced to court filings, regulator reports, and platform disclosures.
Last updated August 2026
Bettor & Trader Privacy Survey — August 2026
We surveyed 400 U.S. adults who placed a real-money sports bet or traded on a prediction market in the past 12 months, to see how much they know about the tracking and breach history documented on this page.
n = 400 · U.S. adults (21+) who bet or traded in the past 12 months · fielded August 2026
The Scale of Data Collection Behind Every Bet
Legal online betting runs on constant location verification; prediction markets run on standard ad-tech tracking. Both are now under active legal and regulatory scrutiny.Legal Betting Runs on Constant Location Verification
Every legal online sports bet in the US requires real-time proof the bettor is physically inside a licensed state — a compliance requirement that generates enormous location-data volume as a byproduct.GeoComply, the dominant vendor for US sports-betting geolocation compliance, states it processes over 1.2 billion geolocation checks monthly across gaming platforms with better than 99.99% uptime. The same 1.2 billion monthly figure was independently cited by the New York State Gaming Commission in its own first-year review of mobile sports wagering.
When Missouri’s online sportsbooks went live in December 2025, GeoComply recorded more than 2.6 million geolocation checks statewide in the first 24 hours alone, alongside roughly 188,000 pre-registered accounts created in the two weeks prior.
A Prediction Market Faces a Federal Privacy Class Action Over Tracking
Filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in 2026, Vazquez et al. v. Kalshi alleges the prediction-market platform let dozens of third parties monitor users’ trading activity without meaningful consent.The complaint alleges data was transmitted during the act of placing a trade, not just general browsing. According to the filing, Kalshi “employs over 60 different third-party trackers on its website,” including technologies associated with Google, Meta, TikTok, LinkedIn, HypeLab, Rokt, Amplitude and AppLovin. Four of those trackers allegedly captured data specifically during trade submission — including which market was selected, whether the user bought or sold “Yes” or “No” contracts, order details, device identifiers, browser information and approximate location.
| Allegation | Detail |
|---|---|
| Trackers embedded site-wide | 60+, per the complaint |
| Trackers active during trade submission | 4, capturing trade-specific data |
| Data allegedly transmitted | Market selected, order info, device ID, browser info, approximate location |
| Consent mechanism challenged | No affirmative accept required for terms/privacy policy at signup |
Source: Vazquez et al. v. Kalshi, Inc., U.S. District Court, S.D.N.Y., filed 2026, as reported by ReadWrite/PressBee, July 10, 2026. Kalshi had not filed a response to the privacy complaint as of that reporting.
A Major Sportsbook Has Been Hit by the Same Attack Twice
DraftKings — one of the two largest US sportsbooks — has disclosed credential-stuffing attacks on its own betting platform in both 2022 and 2025, exposing account and transaction data directly, not through a parent company’s unrelated systems.The first incident cost customers real money; the pattern repeated three years later. In November 2022, DraftKings disclosed that attackers used stolen login credentials from other websites to break into customer accounts, draining up to $300,000 before the company refunded 67,995 affected customers. In October 2025, DraftKings notified customers of a second, similar credential-stuffing campaign, later clarifying the incident affected fewer than 30 accounts. In both cases DraftKings said its own systems were not directly breached — attackers reused passwords leaked from unrelated services — but the recurrence highlights how account-level exposure at a betting platform, even without a network intrusion, still results in name, address, date of birth, payment card and transaction data being exposed.
What Bettors and Traders Actually Say About Their Data
NoDeposit.Guru surveyed 400 U.S. adults who placed a real-money sports bet or traded on a prediction market in the past 12 months, fielded August 2026, to see how the numbers above line up with what users themselves know, notice, and want changed.Users Suspect the Tracking, Skip the Fine Print, and Trust Neither Platform Type
Respondents were aware they’re being watched on location, but far less aware of the ad-tech and breach exposure documented above — and most never actually read what they agreed to.Awareness of GPS tracking is high; awareness of data sharing and breaches is not. 63.5% of respondents already knew betting apps verify real-time physical location on every bet, and another 22.8% suspected it. But only 34.3% knew platforms commonly share activity data with third-party advertisers, and just 27.0% knew a major sportsbook has disclosed customer account breaches in both 2022 and 2025 — despite 20.8% saying real-time location checks have personally caused them a problem while inside a legal state.
| Finding | Result |
|---|---|
| Read the platform’s privacy policy or terms fully before signing up | 4.5% |
| Skimmed the privacy policy or terms | 30.3% |
| Did not read it at all | 65.3% |
| Somewhat or very uncomfortable with real-time GPS checks | 21.8% |
| Not confident platforms adequately protect their financial and personal data | 30.6% |
| Trust neither sportsbooks nor prediction markets with their personal data | 32.0% |
| Changed a password after breach news | 28.3% |
| Enabled two-factor authentication after breach news | 23.5% |
| Would use a “privacy-first” platform even with fewer promotions and bonuses | 37.8% definitely, 46.0% maybe |
Source: NoDeposit.Guru original survey of 400 U.S. adults (21+) who placed a real-money sports bet or traded on a prediction market in the past 12 months. Fielded August 2026. 75.5% male / 22.0% female / 2.5% preferred not to say; 62.8% aged 25–44; respondents were drawn from 44 U.S. states, led by New York (10.3%), California (10.0%), Texas (9.0%) and Florida (8.5%).
Frequently Asked Questions
GeoComply, the leading vendor for US sports-betting geolocation compliance, states it processes more than 1.2 billion geolocation checks monthly across gaming platforms — a figure independently cited by the New York State Gaming Commission in its own review of mobile sports wagering.
Yes. A federal class action filed in the Southern District of New York in 2026 alleges Kalshi embedded more than 60 third-party trackers on its site and transmitted trading activity and device data to companies including Google, Meta and TikTok without adequate user consent.
Yes. DraftKings disclosed credential-stuffing attacks on customer accounts in both November 2022 and October 2025. The 2022 incident resulted in up to $300,000 stolen before DraftKings refunded 67,995 affected customers; the 2025 incident, per the company, affected fewer than 30 accounts.
US law requires real-money sports betting to verify a user is physically located inside a state where it’s licensed, checked continuously during play, not just at signup. That regulatory requirement is what generates the scale of location-check volume seen industry-wide.
Only partially. In a NoDeposit.Guru survey of 400 U.S. bettors and traders (August 2026), 86.3% were aware or suspected real-time GPS tracking, but just 34.3% knew platforms commonly share activity data with third-party advertisers, and only 27.0% knew a major sportsbook has disclosed customer account breaches in both 2022 and 2025. 65.3% never read the platform’s privacy policy or terms of service at all.
Cite This Page
NoDeposit.Guru. “Gambling & Prediction Market Data Privacy Statistics 2026.” August 2026. https://www.nodeposit.guru/gambling-data-privacy-statistics/
More Gambling Industry Statistics
Sources & Methodology
- GeoComply — company-reported geolocation check volume (1.2 billion monthly), corroborated by the New York State Gaming Commission’s “First Year Review, Mobile Sports Wagering” report.
- GeoComply — Missouri launch-day geolocation data, reported by SBC Americas and Yahoo Sports, December 2-3, 2025.
- Vazquez et al. v. Kalshi, Inc. — U.S. District Court, S.D.N.Y., filed 2026, as reported by ReadWrite, July 10, 2026.
- BleepingComputer — “DraftKings warns of account breaches in credential stuffing attacks,” by Sergiu Gatlan, October 7, 2025 (includes DraftKings’ own November 2022 disclosure of the earlier incident and customer refund figures).
- NoDeposit.Guru — original survey of 400 U.S. adults (21+) who placed a real-money sports bet or traded on a prediction market in the past 12 months. Fielded August 2026.
The Kalshi litigation is ongoing and allegations in the complaint are not yet proven in court. No figure on this page is an internal estimate; every number traces to a named external source. Page reviewed and refreshed periodically as litigation develops.