Gambling & Prediction Market Data Privacy Statistics 2026

Gambling & Prediction Market Data Privacy Statistics 2026

How much location and behavioral data betting and prediction-market platforms collect, and the litigation now testing whether that data is handled lawfully — sourced to court filings, regulator reports, and platform disclosures.

Last updated August 2026

Original research

Bettor & Trader Privacy Survey — August 2026

We surveyed 400 U.S. adults who placed a real-money sports bet or traded on a prediction market in the past 12 months, to see how much they know about the tracking and breach history documented on this page.

65.8%had no idea platforms share activity data with advertisers
73%didn’t know a major sportsbook was breached in 2022 and 2025
76.5%want a law forcing disclosure of every third party that gets their data
See the full survey results →

n = 400 · U.S. adults (21+) who bet or traded in the past 12 months · fielded August 2026

At a Glance

The Scale of Data Collection Behind Every Bet

Legal online betting runs on constant location verification; prediction markets run on standard ad-tech tracking. Both are now under active legal and regulatory scrutiny.
1.2B+
Geolocation checks processed monthly across U.S. and Canadian betting platforms
GeoComply; cited by NY State Gaming Commission
60+
Third-party trackers alleged embedded on a single prediction-market platform’s site
Vazquez et al. v. Kalshi, filed 2026
68K
DraftKings customers refunded after a 2022 credential-stuffing attack on the sportsbook itself
BleepingComputer, reporting DraftKings’ own disclosure
2.6M
Geolocation checks recorded in Missouri sportsbooks’ first 24 hours live, Dec 2025
GeoComply

Geolocation Compliance

Legal Betting Runs on Constant Location Verification

Every legal online sports bet in the US requires real-time proof the bettor is physically inside a licensed state — a compliance requirement that generates enormous location-data volume as a byproduct.
1.2 billion/month
Industry-wide check volume

GeoComply, the dominant vendor for US sports-betting geolocation compliance, states it processes over 1.2 billion geolocation checks monthly across gaming platforms with better than 99.99% uptime. The same 1.2 billion monthly figure was independently cited by the New York State Gaming Commission in its own first-year review of mobile sports wagering.

Source: GeoComply company disclosures; New York State Gaming Commission, “First Year Review, Mobile Sports Wagering”
2.6 million
Missouri, first 24 hours of legal betting

When Missouri’s online sportsbooks went live in December 2025, GeoComply recorded more than 2.6 million geolocation checks statewide in the first 24 hours alone, alongside roughly 188,000 pre-registered accounts created in the two weeks prior.

Source: GeoComply, reported by SBC Americas and Yahoo Sports, December 2-3, 2025

Litigation

A Prediction Market Faces a Federal Privacy Class Action Over Tracking

Filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in 2026, Vazquez et al. v. Kalshi alleges the prediction-market platform let dozens of third parties monitor users’ trading activity without meaningful consent.

The complaint alleges data was transmitted during the act of placing a trade, not just general browsing. According to the filing, Kalshi “employs over 60 different third-party trackers on its website,” including technologies associated with Google, Meta, TikTok, LinkedIn, HypeLab, Rokt, Amplitude and AppLovin. Four of those trackers allegedly captured data specifically during trade submission — including which market was selected, whether the user bought or sold “Yes” or “No” contracts, order details, device identifiers, browser information and approximate location.

AllegationDetail
Trackers embedded site-wide60+, per the complaint
Trackers active during trade submission4, capturing trade-specific data
Data allegedly transmittedMarket selected, order info, device ID, browser info, approximate location
Consent mechanism challengedNo affirmative accept required for terms/privacy policy at signup

Source: Vazquez et al. v. Kalshi, Inc., U.S. District Court, S.D.N.Y., filed 2026, as reported by ReadWrite/PressBee, July 10, 2026. Kalshi had not filed a response to the privacy complaint as of that reporting.


Account Security

A Major Sportsbook Has Been Hit by the Same Attack Twice

DraftKings — one of the two largest US sportsbooks — has disclosed credential-stuffing attacks on its own betting platform in both 2022 and 2025, exposing account and transaction data directly, not through a parent company’s unrelated systems.

The first incident cost customers real money; the pattern repeated three years later. In November 2022, DraftKings disclosed that attackers used stolen login credentials from other websites to break into customer accounts, draining up to $300,000 before the company refunded 67,995 affected customers. In October 2025, DraftKings notified customers of a second, similar credential-stuffing campaign, later clarifying the incident affected fewer than 30 accounts. In both cases DraftKings said its own systems were not directly breached — attackers reused passwords leaked from unrelated services — but the recurrence highlights how account-level exposure at a betting platform, even without a network intrusion, still results in name, address, date of birth, payment card and transaction data being exposed.


Original Research

What Bettors and Traders Actually Say About Their Data

NoDeposit.Guru surveyed 400 U.S. adults who placed a real-money sports bet or traded on a prediction market in the past 12 months, fielded August 2026, to see how the numbers above line up with what users themselves know, notice, and want changed.
65.8%
Had no idea platforms commonly share activity data with outside advertisers before taking this survey
NoDeposit.Guru Survey, Aug 2026, n=400
73%
Were unaware a major U.S. sportsbook has disclosed account breaches in both 2022 and 2025
NoDeposit.Guru Survey, Aug 2026, n=400
58.3%
Say learning a platform shared their individual bet or trade data with advertisers would significantly cut trust or drive them off the platform entirely
NoDeposit.Guru Survey, Aug 2026, n=400
76.5%
Would support a law requiring platforms to clearly disclose every third party that receives their data
NoDeposit.Guru Survey, Aug 2026, n=400

Survey Findings

Users Suspect the Tracking, Skip the Fine Print, and Trust Neither Platform Type

Respondents were aware they’re being watched on location, but far less aware of the ad-tech and breach exposure documented above — and most never actually read what they agreed to.

Awareness of GPS tracking is high; awareness of data sharing and breaches is not. 63.5% of respondents already knew betting apps verify real-time physical location on every bet, and another 22.8% suspected it. But only 34.3% knew platforms commonly share activity data with third-party advertisers, and just 27.0% knew a major sportsbook has disclosed customer account breaches in both 2022 and 2025 — despite 20.8% saying real-time location checks have personally caused them a problem while inside a legal state.

FindingResult
Read the platform’s privacy policy or terms fully before signing up4.5%
Skimmed the privacy policy or terms30.3%
Did not read it at all65.3%
Somewhat or very uncomfortable with real-time GPS checks21.8%
Not confident platforms adequately protect their financial and personal data30.6%
Trust neither sportsbooks nor prediction markets with their personal data32.0%
Changed a password after breach news28.3%
Enabled two-factor authentication after breach news23.5%
Would use a “privacy-first” platform even with fewer promotions and bonuses37.8% definitely, 46.0% maybe

Source: NoDeposit.Guru original survey of 400 U.S. adults (21+) who placed a real-money sports bet or traded on a prediction market in the past 12 months. Fielded August 2026. 75.5% male / 22.0% female / 2.5% preferred not to say; 62.8% aged 25–44; respondents were drawn from 44 U.S. states, led by New York (10.3%), California (10.0%), Texas (9.0%) and Florida (8.5%).


Common Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much location data do sports betting apps collect?
+

GeoComply, the leading vendor for US sports-betting geolocation compliance, states it processes more than 1.2 billion geolocation checks monthly across gaming platforms — a figure independently cited by the New York State Gaming Commission in its own review of mobile sports wagering.

Is Kalshi being sued over data privacy?
+

Yes. A federal class action filed in the Southern District of New York in 2026 alleges Kalshi embedded more than 60 third-party trackers on its site and transmitted trading activity and device data to companies including Google, Meta and TikTok without adequate user consent.

Has a major sportsbook had a data breach?
+

Yes. DraftKings disclosed credential-stuffing attacks on customer accounts in both November 2022 and October 2025. The 2022 incident resulted in up to $300,000 stolen before DraftKings refunded 67,995 affected customers; the 2025 incident, per the company, affected fewer than 30 accounts.

Why do legal betting apps need so much location data?
+

US law requires real-money sports betting to verify a user is physically located inside a state where it’s licensed, checked continuously during play, not just at signup. That regulatory requirement is what generates the scale of location-check volume seen industry-wide.

Do bettors and traders know their data is being tracked and shared?
+

Only partially. In a NoDeposit.Guru survey of 400 U.S. bettors and traders (August 2026), 86.3% were aware or suspected real-time GPS tracking, but just 34.3% knew platforms commonly share activity data with third-party advertisers, and only 27.0% knew a major sportsbook has disclosed customer account breaches in both 2022 and 2025. 65.3% never read the platform’s privacy policy or terms of service at all.

Cite This Page

NoDeposit.Guru. “Gambling & Prediction Market Data Privacy Statistics 2026.” August 2026. https://www.nodeposit.guru/gambling-data-privacy-statistics/

Charts and figures on this page may be reproduced with attribution and a link back to this page.


Sources & Methodology

  1. GeoComply — company-reported geolocation check volume (1.2 billion monthly), corroborated by the New York State Gaming Commission’s “First Year Review, Mobile Sports Wagering” report.
  2. GeoComply — Missouri launch-day geolocation data, reported by SBC Americas and Yahoo Sports, December 2-3, 2025.
  3. Vazquez et al. v. Kalshi, Inc. — U.S. District Court, S.D.N.Y., filed 2026, as reported by ReadWrite, July 10, 2026.
  4. BleepingComputer — “DraftKings warns of account breaches in credential stuffing attacks,” by Sergiu Gatlan, October 7, 2025 (includes DraftKings’ own November 2022 disclosure of the earlier incident and customer refund figures).
  5. NoDeposit.Guru — original survey of 400 U.S. adults (21+) who placed a real-money sports bet or traded on a prediction market in the past 12 months. Fielded August 2026.

The Kalshi litigation is ongoing and allegations in the complaint are not yet proven in court. No figure on this page is an internal estimate; every number traces to a named external source. Page reviewed and refreshed periodically as litigation develops.